简介: 【摘 要】目的:探讨对流行性出血热患者,临床各期进行心理护理的干预效果。方法:选取 43例流行性出血热患者为研究对象,随机分成研究组( n=22)与对照( n=21),对照组予以常规护理,研究组在对照组常规护理的基础上,在临床各期予以患者针对性的心理护理,观察两组患者住院满意度。结果:研究组患者住院总满意率为 95.45%,明显高于对照组 80.95%的总满意率,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:对流行性出血热,临床各期实施心理护理可提高患者住院满意率,值得推广。 【关键词】流行性出血热 ;临床各期心理护理 ;住院满意度 [Abstract] Objective: To explore the intervention effect of psychological nursing on patients with epidemic hemorrhagic fever in different clinical stages. Methods: 43 patients with epidemic hemorrhagic fever were randomly divided into study group (n = 22) and control group (n = 21). The control group was given routine nursing, and the study group was given targeted psychological nursing in each clinical stage on the basis of routine nursing in the control group. Results: the total satisfaction rate of the study group was 95.45%, which was significantly higher than 80.95% of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: for epidemic hemorrhagic fever, the implementation of psychological nursing in different clinical stages can improve the satisfaction rate of patients in hospital, which is worthy of promotion.
简介: 【摘 要】目的:总结早期护理干预对提高肝硬化肝性脑病患者满意度的调查。方法:将我科 2018年 1月至 2019年 6月收治的 60例肝硬化肝性脑病患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各 30例,实验组实行早期护理干预,对照组实行常规护理,出院时对比护理满意度,分析结果。结果:实验组的护理满意度显著高于对照组,分析差异有统计学意义(
简介: [摘要 ]目的:观察在艾滋病患者中采取心理护理干预对其负性情绪和服药依从性的影响分析。方法:将我院近期( 2017年 08月 -2018年 08月)收治艾滋病患者总计 100例。随机数字法分成对照组( 50例)与心理组( 50例)。其中对照组采取常规护酐预。心理组实施心理护理干预。对照两组患者干预前、后焦虑、抑郁评分。护理干预后用药依从性及生活质量评分。结果:两组患者护理干预前 SDS、 SAS评分差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。具有可比性。护理干预后两组患者 SDS、 SAS评分较护理前有明显下降。且心理组患者评分明显少于对照组。差异具有统计学意义( P<0.01)。心理组患者 98%服药依从性好。对照组患者 86%服药依从性好。目心理组患者生活质量评分明显高于对照组。差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:对于艾滋病患者。采助心理护理干预。可有效改善患者焦虑、抑郁的负性情绪。提高患者服药依从性。并改善患者生活质量。效果理想。 [关键词 ]心理护理干预 ;艾滋病患者 ;负性情绪 ;服药依从性 [Abstract] Objective: To observe the effect of psychological nursing intervention on the negative emotions and medication compliance of AIDS patients. Methods: a total of 100 AIDS patients were treated in our hospital from August 2017 to August 2018. They were randomly divided into control group (50 cases) and psychological group (50 cases). The control group was given routine nursing. The psychological group was given psychological nursing intervention. The anxiety and depression scores of the two groups were compared before and after the intervention. After nursing intervention, medication compliance and quality of life score. Results: there was no significant difference in SDS and SAS scores between the two groups before nursing intervention (P > 0.05). It is comparable. After nursing intervention, SDS and SAS scores of the two groups were significantly decreased compared with those before nursing. And the score of psychological group was significantly less than that of control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). 98% of patients in psychological group had good medication compliance. 86% of the patients in the control group had good medication compliance. The score of quality of life in the psychological group was significantly higher than that in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: for AIDS patients. Psychological nursing intervention was adopted. It can effectively improve the negative emotions of patients with anxiety and depression. Improve the compliance of patients. And improve the quality of life of patients. The effect is ideal.